|
CHARACTERIZATION OF CZOCHRALSKI SOLAR CELLS GROWN WITH A RECHARGE PROCESS |
|
G. Mihalik and B. Fickett Siemens Solar Industries, Vancouver, WA |
J. Palm Siemens Solar Industries, Munich, GDR |
|
Abstract Siemens
Solar Industries (SSI), in cooperation with the Northwest Energy
Efficiency Alliance (NEEA), has developed a multiple batch recharge
system. The multiple batch
recharge Czochralski process dramatically reduces costs, energy
consumption, material handling, and labor while increasing yields,
throughput, and process capabilities.
Data will show the levels of metals, Carbon, and Oxygen in ten
sequential ingot sections grown at SSI.
Solar cells and modules manufactured from recharge ingots show
consistent performance with those grown from standard batch processes.
|
|
Goals
1)Reduce power consumption by 40% per run (kwh/kg)
2)Reduce Argon consumption by 50% per run (kwh/kg)
3)Increase productivity by 15% (mm/day)
4)Improve or maintain the quality of the ingot produced.
5)Transform the market place, specifically semi-conductor crystal growers in the Northwest, into lower consumers of power and Argon. |
Achievements
1)Reduced power consumption by 51% per run (kwh/kg)
2)Reduced Argon consumption by 85% per run (kwh/kg)
3)Increased productivity by 35% (mm/day)
4)5% higher valued solar cells-better axial Oi
5)Agreement with Wacker and in discussions with MSA.
|
Introduction
In April of 1998, Siemens Solar Industries entered into a jointly funded project with the NEEA to develop a more energy efficient approach to crystal growing. The established project objectives, shown right, were very ambitious. Under the scope of the project, SSI’s hotzones were extensively modified with an energy efficient hotzone (EEH) to meet the technical goals shown above. However, the addition of insulation resulted in a 20% reduction of the initial charge capacity.[i] Therefore, SSI developed a system to add material to the crucible during meltdown. The system was called a topping off system. With the topping off system in place it was also possible to develop a recharge or semi-continuous process. In addition, a market analysis of the Northwest semiconductor manufacturers, engineers, and managers showed much of the interest in the project focused on recharge technology. [ii] With that in mind, SSI shifted its efforts from topping off the initial charge to refining multiple batch recharges. The achievements, shown right, have been demonstrated for systems with an improved hotzone and recharge process. |
|
Results
and Discussion 1.
GDMS Analysis The GDMS is capable of detecting trace levels, ( > 5 ppb ) and in some cases ( > 2 ppb), of metallic contaminants. Samples were cut, rinsed, and labeled before shipping. The laboratory etched the wafers and conducted the tests. The GDMS analysis looked for detectable levels of Fe, Cr, Mo, Al, Ni, and Ba. These metals were selected because of their segregation levels and detriment to the ingot’s electrical characteristics. Segregation would suggest the highest level of impurities would be found in the bottom of the last ingot section analyzed. The investigation of all recharge samples with GDMS showed the accumulation of impurities did not reach the detection limits for any of the metals. 2. FTIR Analysis |
![]() |
| 3. Elymat Lifetime Analysis |
![]() |
![]() |
| 4. Solar Cell Characterization |
|
|
![]() |
|
Samples grown from randomly selected recharge sections were processed into p-line solar cells, shown left, using the SSI manufacturing facility in Camarillo, California. A total of 11 recharge sections were processed into 315 micron wafers and subsequently solar cells. The 11 sections included material from the first, middle, and ends of recharge runs. A batch of approximately 7500 wafers (Test) were compared to cells prior (Pre) to the experiment and after the experiment (Post). The cells processed before and after the experiment were from ingots grown in the standard batch process. A chart of current at a rated voltage (Ivr) shows the consecutive cell results from Pre, Test, and Post solar cells.
|
A
one way ANOVA and box and whiskers analysis of the data shows only a
slight statistical difference between all of the electrical
characteristics studied, including Isc, Voc, FF, and Ivr.[iii]
An example of the Ivr analysis is shown.
The difference in electrical characteristics between standard and
recharge materials is small. Therefore,
the recharge process yields material capable of making effective solar
cells and is consistent with SSI’s standard processed material.
|
![]() |
The
cells were then assembled into SP75 modules and tested for light induced
degradation (LID). Degradation
would be expected if excessive metallic impurities were accumulating in
the subsequent recharge sections. While
the tests show a slightly higher level of degradation for power and Isc,
the test modules performed consistently with one another.
Again, the affects of recharging on LID are comparable with
standard ingots. |
|
Conclusion The ingot, cell, and module results show that material grown from recharge systems can perform as well as material grown from standard or non-recharge processes. The economic benefits of using the recharge process are enormous in that yields and productivity improve, while lowering cost, materials, and energy consumption. The authors thank the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) for their continued support, without which this publication and the realized benefits would not have been possible. |
|
[i] Bryan Fickett and Greg Mihalik, Semiconductor Fabtech 10th Edition (1999) 191-195. [ii] John Reed, Andrew Oh, and Nicholas Hall in: Market Progress Evaluation Report: Silicon Crystal Growing Facilities, No. 1 – Report #E99-034, NEEA, August, 1999. [iii] D. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, pp. 67-79. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997. |